Chris Wickham: A review of Alex Callinicos, Making History: Agency, Structure, and Change in Social Theory. This is an important book [Leiden: Brill, ]. Making History: Agency, Structure, and Change in Social Theory. By Alex Callinicos. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, p. $ – Volume 84 Issue. Making History is about the question – central to social theory – of and a wide range of historical writing, Alex Callinicos seeks to avoid two.
|Published (Last):||20 July 2007|
|PDF File Size:||14.33 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.38 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Chapter 4 comes back to consciousness, but it does so in a much more accessible form.
Alex rated it really liked it Apr 25, Newer Post Older Post Home. A review of Alex Callinicos, Making History: Interests and powers Chapter 4 Ideology and Power 4. Like the Red Queen, we have to run to stay in the same place.
He accepts that there will indeed be crisis situations in which the slowly developing productive forces will come into contradiction with the relations of production, but says qlex how these are actually resolved will depend on the way the class struggle develops in given situations, and this depends on analysing agency. Callinicos is here trying, perhaps above all, to defend the proposition that one can majing the objective interests of human agents including collectivities of agentsand counterpose those to their empirically demonstrable wants.
I would argue that one could get between them in a constructive and noncontradictory way by invoking the strategic analyses of Pierre Bourdieu.
Callinicos points out that that the former are not self-conscious actors, but come to the forefront through a process of “molecular” change and frequently a “compromise” with the old order. While some callimicos these thinkers may be unknown to the reader, others, like Foucault are oft-quoted and rarely understood. Agency, Structure, and Change in Social Theory.
I read this book because I’m a grad student in the social sciences and I need some understanding of the underlying issues of philosophy that Callinicos addresses. Callinicos then shows how nationalism can be explained in Marxist terms though he does not try the same with genderand ends with calllnicos defence of the base-superstructure model, inside carefully defined limits.
Tom rated it really liked it Jul 22, Falsehood and ideology, I 4. Refresh and try again.
Making History – Agency, Structure, and Change in Social Theory
Benjamin and Sartre 5. This is the start of an attack on one of the major targets of the book, the methodological individualism of Max Weber and, most recently, of rational-choice Marxists, who argue precisely this last point.
Michael Chornesky rated it it was ok Jun histkry, Callinicos hlstory as his main aim an exploration of how an understanding of structural analysis and an understanding of agency—why and how people make the choices they make—can be compatible. Brill, ], though not an easy one.
Callinicos is hostile to that tradition, and has written against it elsewhere, but it would need more attention than he gives it here and did already ca,linicos That work was already mostly in the public domain inand its absence here is a flaw. Sign In Forgot password?
Making history : agency, structure, and change in social theory / Alex Callinicos – Details – Trove
Anton rated it liked hhistory Apr 06, Chapter 1 of this book deals with how human agency works. Bart rated it liked it Dec 04, For instance, the roles of say the bourgeoisie during bourgeois revolutions is very different from that of workers in proletarian revolutions.
It is also an important issue for anyone who is interested in where Marxism is going intellectually and how it can continue to offer a scientific analysis capable of supporting political change.
He has written widely about Marxism and social theory. This article is also available for rental through DeepDyve.
Making History: Agency, Structure, and Change in Social Theory
Making History is therefore very dense at points, and it’s hard to see where Callinicos is going when for example he spends the second chapter disputing minutiae of linguistic theory. Most users should sign in with their email address.
This leads him to a discussion of how to understand language which is not only the most difficult section of the book, but also the most dated, for it precedes the immense amount of work that has been done on language histort the post-structuralist tradition.
In his introduction to the second edition, however, especially p. Librarian administrators click here.
Sign in via your Institution Sign in. Note that he does not define structure here—but he does in his new introduction, p.
Thompson here—the most serious proponent, at least among historians, of the contrary position. Mehdi rated it really liked it Apr 30,