REPORT. ISO/TR. First edition. Reference number . This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO/IEC. (International Standard Risk Management ISO Draft Review) ISO , the international standard for Risk Management – ‘Risk Management. Hi:bigwave: Does anybody have a copy of the draft working document ISO they could share with little me? ttfn Ben.
|Published (Last):||26 October 2012|
|PDF File Size:||14.61 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.72 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The final DIS text has not dramatically changed the version and all steps in the process have been kept. The intention is to promote harmonization within ISO documents with respect to risk and its management.
A FERMA voice on ISO implementation | Ferma
Ultimately the decision was made to simplify the text and use other documents, such as ISO Guide 73 to provide additional information to those that need it. The definitions still mentioned in the standard … the following apply are kept to a strict minimum and 311004 those that have updated notes:.
The problem I have with this sentence is the parts between brackets. Please do review and pass on your thoughts and opinions by clicking the box below. It can be positive, negative or both. Although effects can also become risk sources, the way note 1 is phrased only leads to drafr short sighted view on what can be understood by effects.
It is important to keep in mind that we are not drafting an American or European standard, a public sector or financial services standard, but rather a generic international standard.
There was considerable discussion on fundamental issues on the role of standards. Continuity Forum Policy Working Group Members can contact us directly to discuss the process and to obtain copies of document for comment. The vision was to phrase a framework clause that provides guidance that is relevant for every possible user of the standard. The strengthened generic nature of the standard can hopefully provide for confidence between experts and end users who each have specific problems in risk but need to understand and communicate with others stakeholders.
Two of these, the disruption and supply chain risk standards, have failed to make the grade and have recently been officially dropped, draf the legal risk standard ISO is now in development with the national standards bodies of China and the UK jointly leading the work.
The one remark I have is the note 1 on the definition of risk. Cyber There’s a good time coming Initially it was agreed that only minimal changes would be made to the standard while the committee 310044 at the potential for more substantial revision. Below some of the changes to the version of ISO have been summarised and a few words on why the changes are being proposed:. We can expect that the new version of ISO will be published at the end of or early in As this sentence was followed by 29 definitions that fully defined risk management the ISO way.
ISO/TR – Risk management — Guidance for the implementation of ISO
It should be noted that there was some convergence, from initially very different positions, from members of the technical committee, and in some cases National Mirror Committees, towards a shared vision of best practice in global risk management. The major task to accomplish is progress the revision of ISO The result was that it was agreed that there was a need to reduce the text quite a lot but that an appropriate balance between giving guidance with enough details and not turning the guidance offered into a school text book.
Our main challenge was to find a dragt and sensible balance between supplementing the chapter with necessary concepts and not losing sight of all other users. In a series of articles we want to present and discuss the major changes that are to be expected.
The draft of the standard for review and comment is now available on the BSI Draft Review system at https: More interpretations are possible, more definitions come into play and more options in the use of the standard are provided e.
In the committee commenting stages there was a strong desire to address the proliferation of terms, that could impair the ease of access to the standard or add to confusion across sectors for many users. It can be positive sometimes expressed as opportunitiesnegative sometimes expressed as threats or both.
Comparing ISO 31000 (2009) with the draft ISO 31000 (2017) – Part 2
Climate adaptation uso and our BCM approach – a user perspective. The consequences are then the effects of uncertainty on the objectives related to the opportunity pursued.
Hosting services provided by: The process gives you the chance to suggest areas you would like to see adapted or removed and even add new elements that would benefit users in the front line.
Care needed to be taken in in considering all the points raised and discussions on the right way forward took considerable time. The decision to review ISO was taken at in Chicago in and now, 4 years later, a draft version of the proposed updates to the ISO document is available for users to see.